🔗 Share this article

Australia's decisive move to ban social networking access for young people below 16 is sending ripples internationally. Politicians, safety advocates, and guardians are observing intently to see if this approach will set a precedent for countries abroad.

Across Europe Trend

Across Europe, a rising chorus of nations are considering similar measures.

• The Danish government has stated a restriction on social media for under-15s, with the prime minister declaring that phones and networks are "stealing our children's innocence". Legislation could be enacted next year.
• Norway is planning to implement a minimum age limit of 15, citing the need to protect the young from the "influence of the recommendation systems".
• Ireland is working on a digital ID system to verify the age and identity of social media participants. Authorities have indicated that an Australian-model ban is "an tools under consideration".
• In Spain, the president has called on lawmakers to pass a proposal raising the legal age for accessing social media to 16.
• In The French government, the head of state has proposed a ban for those under fifteen, and a parliamentary commission has suggested a related step, alongside an overnight "digital curfew" for adolescents.
• The administration in the Netherlands has recommended guardians to restrict their youngsters from social media until 15.

At the EU level, the European parliament has passed a non-binding resolution supporting a ban for teenagers under 16 unless parental consent is granted. Although it warns of the "compulsive" nature of these services, the move does not create enforceable legislation.

"A clear age barrier is a solid first step," commented one parliamentarian supporting the resolution.

Britain: A Cautious Eye

In the UK, the government has kept open a potential ban, stating that "no measure is being dismissed" but stressing any decision must be "grounded in strong research".

Earlier, momentum gathered behind a bill to introduce restrictions on social media use by teenagers, but it was eventually watered down. Instead, the administration pledged to conduct more studies the topic.

Charities have voiced warnings. One foundation established by the loved ones of a young person who died after viewing disturbing online content contends that a strict age ban could fail to improve online safety and could lead to a "dangerous transition" of exposure when users turn 16.

"Australia's ban is a reaction to the failure of the social media companies to create products and services that are appropriate and fit for young users," commented a influential online safety campaigner.

The US: A Decentralized Landscape

Stateside, action is primarily occurring at the regional level due to country-wide gridlock.

• Utah requires guardian permission for those under 18 to use social media and controls nighttime use.
• The state of Florida has signed a law prohibiting children under fourteen from creating accounts on social media, though it faces legal challenges.
• The state of Virginia has approved a rule limiting teenagers to a single hour of social media access per day, with any further time dependent on adult consent.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have likewise passed bills demanding adult authorization for under-16s to create social media presences.

Even with widespread concern and suggestions from various politicians to mimic the Australian lead, a federal ban is currently seen as unlikely.

International Perspectives

Beyond these regions, other countries are also taking action.

• The Malaysian government intends to ban social media for teenagers effective next year.
• Brazil has lifted the access age for the platform Instagram to 16.

However, international agencies take a more cautious stance. The UN children's agency has cautioned that blanket prohibitions carry risks and "might prove counterproductive". The organization highlights that social networks can be a "lifeline" for marginalized children and that government action should not be a "replacement" for tech companies to invest in safety.

As this global conversation evolves, the steps of Australia and its followers show that governments globally are no longer content to stand by for tech companies to act voluntarily.