Each time a major prize-giving event approaches, you'll find an outcry for introducing fresh award types to recognize underappreciated efforts and satisfy the passions of followers who have specialized interests.
A fellow writer previously argued supporting a scary games classification. It would be amazing. The same goes for tabletop games, this being a passionate advocate's mission. Yet I need to apologize in advance for pushing forward because like all dedicated enthusiasts, there's a strong justification supporting my request stands as crucial and important of all. Here's the proposal: It's essential to create a category for puzzle games.
Categorizing Game Types
Organizing artistic expressions isn't exact; it’s very subjective, and it will always spark debates and end in fuzzy definitions. This explains why movie academies steer clear of genre categories. But it is an essential concession within the realm of interactive entertainment, showing incredible range they barely qualify a single creative category.
To recognize the complete range of achievement in video games to gain proper attention, and for games of all stripes to have a chance for representation, classification by type becomes crucial.
Current Gaming Award Categories
The major gaming awards offer these award types recognizing Action, Action/Adventure, RPG experiences, Fighting, Simulation and strategy titles, plus athletic and racing experiences. Between them, these six categories actually cover numerous genres, and you can find room for numerous titles.
This doesn't apply to brain-teasing titles. No appropriate category exists for their placement. Consider three of outstanding current releases, each quite distinct: building puzzles of one title, fast-paced pattern recognition in a different title, thought-provoking social scenarios from additional release. Where could they possibly go between these six categories? Simply put, no category fits.
The Representation Problem
There are dozens outstanding logic titles released every year that have no home in entertainment awards, except when they manage to fit for categories like Handheld titles, VR/AR Game, and the highly challenging small studio competitions.
- An iconic brain-teaser wasn’t nominated in any category in 2014
- Another imaginative release received no nominations during that ceremony
- Popular arranging title got ignored recently
- Only a few brain-teasers barely qualified for niche award types
Importance of Logic Titles
These are often modest productions, yet the craft in brain-teasers holds tremendous importance. Iconic mobile puzzle games rank among the most-played games in the world continuing this trend for over a decade.
The legendary block-stacking game challenges famous sandbox experiences for the title of highest-selling title ever; it additionally competes for best game of all time. Brain-teasers form essential building blocks within interactive entertainment, and engaging with almost every other genre.
Recommendation and Reasoning
Puzzle games wouldn’t have that issue. It would be easy to populate multiple candidates engaging, different, qualified experiences every year with ease — actually, with challenge, because you’d have to leave so many good games out.
And to reiterate, these include experiences that otherwise have no home in important events. Logic title developers operate at the demanding boundary game development, producing among essential manifestations of gaming itself. Just like movie stunt professionals, they deserve recognition. Let’s not keep them waiting 35 years.
